马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即注册
x
第一部分 肌苷
# n# U) _4 x7 T, ~1 z
# W5 A2 {' d2 o3 O8 f 0 _- u- t- V+ U# j9 U7 A8 H
《Inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumors: A randomized, controlled, Phase 2 study》 一文介绍了一项前瞻性随机对照二期临床试验:6 a/ {2 X: X! X( D7 l) p S
' g& K* e! V- _6 b0 O9 z$ G1、入组患者:172名晚期实体瘤患者,分为 ICB免疫治疗+肌苷组和 ICB免疫治疗组不联合肌苷(该组部分患者联合了化疗或者靶向)两组,每组86名患者。1 W- R( p: c( g$ |+ V" R+ ^
; q; R! D+ v4 C6 \& T
2、肌苷用法:口服肌苷片,每天三次,每次0.2克。9 ~; j k @7 S4 U: e
$ t- `8 |* y1 e$ k9 R( A. ]# @
3、试验结果:肌苷组和非肌苷组中位PFS (95% CI)分别为7.00(5.31-8.69)和4.40(3.10-5.70)个月(风险比[HR]0.63;95%置信区间为0.44–0.90,p= 0.011),肌苷组PFS提高有统计学意义。ORR分别为26.7%和15.1%(p= 0.061),肌苷组ORR有改善。非肌苷组中位OS为29.67个月(95% CI 17.40–41.94),肌苷组中位OS尚未达到。
: H1 o* _ S0 S1 P. A* i9 c( d 1 j3 ^" ]: I. b8 W/ w1 J, ]4 n! P
肌苷组和非肌苷组分别有25名(29%)和31名(36%)患者出现3级和4级不良反应,肌苷组的不良反应趋于减少。
+ C% ~, ^; ^5 Y. q% _) ~8 a 6 w; \% c {( ]4 n$ m$ O
1 J! A+ Y K) v7 J6 P M1 q
1 l& N% r, Y5 O* w+ T第二部分 β-葡聚糖0 H, |/ I- w- a& e9 N
' x' X t/ N7 U7 A+ e / V9 P0 q" d/ C8 i6 _. J9 D/ U
《β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar as immune rechallenge for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer》一文介绍了一项前瞻性随机对照二期临床试验,β-葡聚糖+pd-1i 恩沃利 + 抗血管生成药物治疗先前pd-1i治疗失败的非小细胞肺癌。
1 O( P" s5 g# Z: r& |
! c1 M: Z- b+ H i/ O# b1、入组患者:23名晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,这些患者之前用pd-1i治疗都已经失败。/ l( e8 K+ x8 L2 w
9 D+ R" _ B. @8 N: Z2、β-葡聚糖用法:每天两次,每次500毫克。; H: f! x x, t# U5 }
6 p$ S6 A* X' t8 l/ E& L3、试验结果:ORR 21.7%,DCR 73.9%.,PFS 4.3个月,OS 8.9个月。PD-L1阳性和阴性亚组之间的mPFS有显著差异(6.3个月对2.3个月,p = 0.002)。5 r% d" q0 ^9 [. h' Q
, X/ W6 f5 m5 k( _
52.2%的患者发生了治疗相关的不良事件。最常见的原因是甲状腺功能减退(26.1%)和疲劳(26.1%)。报告了2例(8.7%)3级不良事件。未观察到与死亡相关的不良反应。
! j% n' s5 a& ] q. h
8 K9 c2 \& [+ E* f5 ?" I$ U9 M8 m蛋白质组学分析显示CASP-8、ARG1、MMP12、CD28和CXCL5的水平与对治疗的抗性相关,而CD40-L和EGF的水平与有利的反应相关。5 ~8 V0 i% m9 F5 P
) |4 V1 \1 E; E6 g; Y
(因为患者都是之前用pd-1i都已经失败的患者,所以ORR 21.7%,DCR 73.9% 还是很不错的)
, ?* n, {: G. T, [- Y1 d* e! n/ q
- C& D5 V# x D- ^6 p/ B. Y3 S8 v
W/ F. ?: H" k+ i. eI 《Inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumors: A randomized, controlled, Phase 2 study》
1 ]. S4 C$ D. q. L7 t# d
( K u' k, Z" YBackground: This study aimed to evaluate whether inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in human malignant solid tumors.) f0 g. `) g1 K, O: t# \1 @: q# g- l
/ J1 P$ Y, Q) w( J
Methods: This single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label study was conducted, from January 2021 to December 2022, in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, and participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the inosine (trial) or non-inosine (control) group that received inosine (dosage: 0.2 g, three times/day) + PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor or only PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor ± targeted ± chemotherapy, respectively. Efficacy was assessed every 6 weeks (i.e., after every two-three treatment cycles). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR); the secondary endpoints were disease control rate, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05809336).
: m0 A5 @ W; s9 M4 L
. O) i0 J" g* O, mResults: Among the 172 participants with advanced malignant solid tumors, 86 each were assigned to the inosine and non-inosine groups, wherein the median PFS (95% CI) was 7.00 (5.31-8.69) and 4.40 (3.10-5.70) months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63; 95% CI 0.44-0.90, p = 0.011), and the ORR was 26.7% and 15.1%, respectively (p = 0.061). In the inosine and non-inosine groups, the median OS was not reached and was 29.67 (95% CI 17.40-41.94) months, respectively (HR 1.05 [95% CI 0.59-1.84], p = 0.874). Compared with the non-inosine group, the median PFS and ORR of the inosine group were significantly prolonged and improved in the multiple exploratory subgroup analyses. The safety analysis showed that Grades 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 25 (29%) and 31 (36%) patients in the inosine and non-inosine groups, respectively, and tended to decrease in the inosine group compared with the non-inosine group.
$ n8 ~7 I; e; P1 P! l, W6 f' S
8 v: n/ ^ K6 A$ \; W; \8 }# CConclusion: Inosine had a tendency to enhance the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and reduced immunotherapy-related adverse reactions.6 M- \7 e, y/ J7 l T: x a- d
/ d& v. A* x9 v( x% V & O4 @4 |3 y8 @' X1 \ |
0 n* k4 S6 M- b1 TII 《β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar as immune rechallenge for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer》
8 [! S B' M3 x6 v
- T/ o! E& U+ `7 G0 tBackground: Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge has emerged as a prominent study area in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). β-glucan was reported to reverse resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors by regulating the tumor microenvironment. In this self-initiated clinical trial (ChiCTR2100054796), NSCLC participants who have previously failed anti-PD-1 therapy received β-glucan (500 mg, bid, d1-21), Envafolimab (300 mg, d1) and Endostar (210 mg, civ72h) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The clinical efficacy and adverse events were observed, while serum samples were collected for proteomic analysis.8 ?+ O* J, f D! z1 L7 ?2 r5 M
' u4 L# i1 p; N2 `! k5 t' U
Results: Twenty Three patients were enrolled from January 2022 to March 2023 (median age, 65 years; male, n = 18 [78.3%]; squamous NSCLC, n = 9 [39.1%]; mutant type, n = 13 [56.5%]). The overall response rate (ORR) was 21.7% and disease control rate (DCR) was 73.9%. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) was 4.3 months [95% CI: 2.0-6.6] and 9.8 months [95% CI: 7.2-12.4], respectively. The mPFS between PD-L1 positive and negative subgroup has significant difference (6.3 months vs. 2.3 months, p = 0.002). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 52.2% of patients. The most common TRAEs were hypothyroidism (26.1%) and fatigue (26.1%). 2 (8.7%) grade 3 adverse events were reported. No adverse reaction related deaths have been observed. Proteomic analysis revealed that the levels of CASP-8, ARG1, MMP12, CD28 and CXCL5 correlated with resistance to the treatment while the levels of CD40-L and EGF related to the favorable response.
; w' W: }+ G* ~' x) b5 b
2 E/ a- m& U W- W% nConclusion: β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar has considerable efficacy and safety for immune rechallenge in metastatic NSCLC patients who failed of anti-PD-1 treatment previously, especially for PD-L1 positive patients. |